This is a discussion on Does a lower Academic bar, mean lower character? within the Georgia Tech Football forums, part of the Georgia Tech Sports Message Boards category; As the trials and tribulations grind on at the Flats, I wonder. We have petitioned the Hill to let the ...
As the trials and tribulations grind on at the Flats, I wonder. We have petitioned the Hill to let the football coach offer scholarships to recruits that may or may not have the academic wherewithal, preparation, or innate intelligence to do the classroom work at Georgia Tech. In so doing, are we opening the doors to athletes that are more likely to be disciplinary problems, benders or breakers of rules, young men of lesser character, if you will, than the players with the grades and test scores indicative of better students? When standards are lowered, does it necessarily follow that they are lowered across the board? Surely it doesn't take 1400 on the SAT to understand right from wrong, does it? Maybe the Hill is smarter than the rest of us. After all, they have been doing this for 100 years---and they have four National Championships in their trophy case, ne c'est pas?
Biggest bunch of arrogant BS i have ever heard, and i realize OP was just posing a question. I have acquaintences that never finished college, friends that went to ugag and have known people that could not go to college at all - and they are successful, God loving, honest and hard working people. A man worked for our family that could not read but i would trust my family, possessions and life to him.
Tech people often love to hurt themselves. Real smart.
Lower standards tend to bring lower-charactered individuals, no question.
DCS: "I'll give Helluva the nod on this one."
12 out of 13. When will this stop?
Bobby Godd never, not once, ever blamed his boys for a loss. It was always on his shoulders, and his shoulders alone. That is greatness. This is not. --YukonWreck
Today's society is not a Flexbone society. --HelluvaMgtMajor
GT uniform critic.
Certainly this is a board and everyone is entitled to their opinion. It is just that mine is right and yours is wrong. --91Wreck
I don't think there's anything wrong with acknowledging that someone who isn't very smart has a higher likelihood of getting into trouble. Doesn't mean that all or most of them or bad or that smart people don't do dome stuff, but the chances are certainly higher as intelligence goes down. Prison isn't full of college grads. Of course all this is really about socioeconomic factors more than anything.
Last edited by HelluvaMGTmjr; 07-25-2014 at 07:44 AM.
[QUOTE=clapper gold;106408]Biggest bunch of arrogant BS i have ever heard, and i realize OP was just posing a question. I have acquaintences that never finished college, friends that went to ugag and have known people that could not go to college at all - and they are successful, God loving, honest and hard working people. A man worked for our family that could not read but i would trust my family, possessions and life to him.
Tech people often love to hurt themselves. Real smart.[/QUOTE
Sorry, Clapper, I wasn't trying to make a connection between "smarts" and integrity or success. Not by any means. My question was based on personal observation. The premise is that STUDENTS, who also excel at football in high school tend to fall into various categories. One set contains the star athlete that does his homework, juggles the rigors of school and sports, is a good time manager, probably involved in other extra curricular activites, and is well prepared for college when the time comes. Another set contains the uber-talented player that recognizes (often very early on) that his prowess is a marketable commodity. It can be bartered for privilege, for grades, to avoid disciplinary action, etc. He lives under a different set of rules. I have seen middle school grades requested to be changed to preserve eligibilty. Players from this set can, understandably, believe that rules do not apply to them. These kids are not so much "dumber" as they are ill-prepared to work hard at anything other than athletics. I was just wondering if we are getting some kids that when confronted with the strict realities, in and out of the classroom, are not willing, or even able, to buckle down and toe the mark.
I've known many really smart people who were jerks. And, I have known a lot of hard working not very well educated people who were saints.
So, no, the answer to your question is that I see no correlation between SAT scores and discipline issues.