Jeremi Hall Beefs Up Georgia Tech's Recruiting

Thanks Jim. Do you ever remember a 2 /3 / 4 star rating spread? Of course Rivals must be right

Great to have him coming too! Welcome.

Any idea what his major would be? It's good that his mother likes GT so we don't get Tuitted.

Originally Posted by Ga Tech Navy Nuke

Thanks Jim. Do you ever remember a 2 /3 / 4 star rating spread? Of course Rivals must be right

Great to have him coming too! Welcome.

Any idea what his major would be? It's good that his mother likes GT so we don't get Tuitted.

Nuke, I can't remember any 2/3/4 rated player, least not one that we've recruited. Although 247 has him rated with a numerical 79 which is one notch away from being a "3-star".

Not sure what his major will be. When I met him face to fact back in early December and spoke with him he didn't sound very interested in Georgia Tech.. or perhaps he's a great poker player. If he and Devine want to not only attend the same place but also play/start together then their chances of doing that are greater at Tech than the football factories.

Thanks.

Wow. TOS has him running a 5.7 40 at 335 pounds. That is serious speed for such a big boy. And ranked 6th in the country as OT.

Definitely will help with the big boys we play. You've got to pity some of the small lines (Duke, D2, Wake) that we play. The most rational strategy will be to intentionally beat them up, wear them down and control the clock. Conan, what is best in life? - YouTube

Running the B-Back dive and the midline option just became a lot easier. If these two can earn starting jobs together we literally added 50 pounds/man to our guards compared to what we've had the past few years.

This says it all about the validity, reliability and accuracy of recruiting service evaluations:

There is a wide discrepancy in how recruiting services view Hall’s talents. 247Sports ranks Hall as a 2-star prospect, Scout.com as a 3-star and Rivals.com as a 4-star.

Then you add this:

You rarely see recruits with three different evaluations from the three aforementioned services.

But this happens all the time.

Originally Posted by dressedcheeseside

This says it all about the validity, reliability and accuracy of recruiting service evaluations:



Then you add this:



But this happens all the time.

Cheese.. subjective evaluations by human beings will at times result in diverse results.

Despite the trillions of dollars thrown at the educational system every year I personally have a lot more trust in the individuals who are evaluating high school football players than the ones teaching them.

Rusty Mansell (247Sports, Chad Simmons (Scout), Scott Kennedy (Scout), etc. are very professional, very dedicated and as impressive as anybody I've every met in the educational system.

You are a teacher.. please explain to me why some kids are graded out as nitwits by some teachers yet other teachers read the same thoughts and review the same work and consider those same kids geniuses?? Why can one teacher grade out an essay an F and others will grade the same paper higher, even an A?

The U.S. spends trillions on the education system.. why is it considered such an abject failure? Despite very good pay and tremendous benefits why are there so many nitwits, knuckleheads and morons who are teachers? (Lot of super educators out there, too)

Why in your opinion is the U.S. education system so screwed up despite all the money spent?? Why is it so much more unreliable than recruiting rankings??

Originally Posted by Jim Hart

Cheese.. subjective evaluations by human beings will at times result in diverse results.

Despite the trillions of dollars thrown at the educational system every year I personally have a lot more trust in the individuals who are evaluating high school football players than the ones teaching them.

Rusty Mansell (247Sports, Chad Simmons (Scout), Scott Kennedy (Scout), etc. are very professional, very dedicated and as impressive as anybody I've every met in the educational system.

You are a teacher.. please explain to me why some kids are graded out as nitwits by some teachers yet other teachers read the same thoughts and review the same work and consider those same kids geniuses?? Why can one teacher grade out an essay an F and others will grade the same paper higher, even an A?

The U.S. spends trillions on the education system.. why is it considered such an abject failure? Despite very good pay and tremendous benefits why are there so many nitwits, knuckleheads and morons who are teachers? (Lot of super educators out there, too)

Why in your opinion is the U.S. education system so screwed up despite all the money spent?? Why is it so much more unreliable than recruiting rankings??

I guess there's just not enough guys like me.

Originally Posted by dressedcheeseside

I guess there's just not enough guys like me.

If they were all like you'd they'd not only be great teachers... they'd be Tech fans!

He might not be a 4 star but on paper sure has future value.I would rather have a 325 lb 3 star Ol than a 275 3 star OL I believe.

Leave these guys alone!!! If they can run and "pancake" everything they come up against, let them have at it! You GT nerds want everyone to be statistically perfect. It doesn't work that way. It's like meeting a beautiful young woman, then taking her downtown to buy a new pair of bolt-ons, before you ever sleep with her! Give them a break!!! Good grief.

Sayin... Reck

I read somewhere that the 247 site's rating is just a system glitch that is supposed to be fixed soon. I think he's a 4* on their site as well.

I dont care what scout and 247 says, Rivals has him as the #6 in the nation...thats the one im looking at.